RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to evaluate the solubility of three types of root canal sealers in three organic solvents used in endodontics. The solubility of calcium-hydroxide-based (Sealer 26), silicon-polydimethylsiloxane-based (RoekoSeal), and zinc-oxide-eugenol based (Endofill and Intrafill) sealers was assessed in eucalyptol, xylol, orange oil, and distilled water. Eighty samples of each filling material were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions and then divided into four groups for immersion in solvent for 2 or 10 min. The means of sealer dissolution in solvents were obtained by the difference between the original preimmersion weight and the postimmersion weight in a digital analytical scale. Data were statistically analyzed with the Student's t test, and multiple comparisons were performed with Student-Newman-Keuls. Xylol and orange oil showed similar effects, with significant solubilization (P<0.05) of the tested cements. Endofill and Sealer 26 did not show any significant difference in solubilization at the two immersion times, whereas RoekoSeal and Intrafill showed a more pronounced solubility at 10 min. The lowest levels of solubilization occurred in RoekoSeal, Sealer 26, Endofill, and Intrafill. It is concluded that xylol and orange oil presented similar solvent effects with a significant solubility of the tested cements.
Asunto(s)
Materiales de Obturación del Conducto Radicular/química , Solventes/química , Bismuto/química , Hidróxido de Calcio/química , Ciclohexanoles/química , Cementos Dentales/química , Dimetilpolisiloxanos/química , Eucaliptol , Eucalyptus , Gutapercha/química , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Monoterpenos/química , Aceites de Plantas/química , Siliconas/química , Solubilidad , Factores de Tiempo , Agua/química , Cemento de Óxido de Zinc-Eugenol/químicaRESUMEN
MAIN PROBLEM: The microfill veneering of hybrid composite restorations has been indicated to improve esthetics. Also, polyethylene fiber reinforcement has been proposed for use in composite restorations in high-stress clinical situations. However, minimal information in the literature addresses the influence of such combinations on the resistance to fracture. The purpose of this study was to investigate the flexural strength of two composites, a microfill and a hybrid, the effect of their combination, and the influence of polyethylene fiber reinforcement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight specimens were prepared using a standard metallic mold (20x2x2 mm) and divided into groups of seven each: Filtek Z-250 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn., USA) (group I), Filtek A-110 (3M ESPE) (group II), Filtek Z-250 combined with Filtek A-110 (group III), and Filtek Z-250 combined with polyethylene fiber (Ribbond, Seattle, Wash., USA) (group IV). The specimens were stress-loaded to fracture in a three-point bending device according to International Standardization Organization (ISO) 4049. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey's test at a 0.05 level of significance. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups I and IV. Group II, however, exhibited statistically lower resistance to fracture than the other groups. Group III presented intermediate results, showing statistically higher fracture resistance than group II but lower than group I. CONCLUSIONS: With the methodology employed, microfill composite presented the lowest flexural strength, but its association with hybrid composite increased the resistance to fracture. The combination of polyethylene fiber and hybrid composite did not present higher flexural strength than hybrid composite alone.
